This was a very interesting article which I enjoyed reading. Bill Jay has several ideas I've never even thought about, such as the fact that people seldom consider the photographer of a photo. Most people only see the photo and consider its possible interpretations, instead of the photographer's intentions behind it. I've been guilty of this myself, however in some cases, I don't mind being like this.
I disagree that the only way a photographer can earn a living is by entering academics. I understand that some people may have to work side jobs and consider art their hobby, but I don't want to do that. My ideal job would be a designer who combines my imagination, photographs, and other art with my other duties, like logos or website themes. It's not a crime to make a living off of your own art; I want to have art be my career. :)
I agree completely with Jay's words ". . . I find
this interesting, significant, beautiful or of value. . . . The photographer produces pictures in
order that his or her interest in a subject can be communicated to others. . ." I've discovered photography is both fun, soothing, but also makes me feel vulnerable. For example, I'm always embarrassed about placing my inner thoughts and ideas in the viewers' hands and being critiqued. I hate being the center of attention and criticism/critique.Even if I need to defend my own work, I prefer to just keep my thoughts to myself and wait until I can fade back into the woodwork.
No comments:
Post a Comment